Clean Energy Futures Study: Sensitivity analysis
Project Description
- The sensitivity analysis of the Clean Energy Future Study's Economic and Carbon Savings Results
by Etan Gumerman (LBNL), Jonathan G. Koomey (LBNL) and Marilyn A. Brown (ORNL) leads to a deeper
understanding of what drives the results of the CEF report. It provides more details on the direct costs and effectiveness of a carbon permit trading system,
demand side efficiency programs, and supply side policies.
It also illustrates how sensitive the advanced scenario results are to an increase in natural gas
and oil prices compared to those prevailing in the Clean Energy Futures advanced case.
To read the sensitivity paper (pdf, 56K) as submitted for publication in Energy Policy, go
here .
Data and results
- In this page you can find all the files with a summary and organization of the results of both
the CEF report and the paper.
There are two different kinds of files, the Energy/Carbon files that contain various sheets
with information on energy use and carbon emissions, and the cost files that contain sheets with
information on costs for investments and programs. The files are in Microsoft Excel 97/98 format;
the size of the energy and carbon files is 1.2 MB, the cost files are 688 K. The files for each
sensitivity case are listed below.
-
Note: The italicizized names correspond to the CEF study's main scenarios (BAU,
Moderate, and Advanced). For clarity, every sensitivity file's name includes the policy
implementation level as well as the carbon trading permit price. The CEF Advanced
scenario is therefore called the "Adv $50" sensitivity, the Moderate Scenario
is called "Mod $0," and Business-as-Usual Scenario is called "BAU $0".
-
Project Staff
- Jonathan Koomey
- Marilyn A. Brown
- Etan Gumerman
- Armande van Duin
-
Publications
- The sensitivity paper (pdf, 56K) Draft version as submitted for publication in Energy Policy
- Scenarios for a Clean Energy Future This website contains the complete CEF report and appendices in PDF format.
- Executive Summary of the Scenarios for a Clean Energy Future (pdf, 120k)
- Chapter 1: Integrated Analysis and Conclusions of the Scenarios for a Clean Energy Future (pdf, 556k)
-
Other Resources
- The Energy Analysis Department's Industrial
Energy Use Group. This group assesses industrial energy use and efficiency around the world.
-
- Energy Information Administration. The official U.S.
government agency for energy statistics.
-
- Beating the heat: Why and how we must
combat global warming.
This book provides a good introduction for the lay person to the issues surrounding climate change,
and the potential solutions.
-
- American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (ACEEE):
This non-profit organization promotes energy efficiency and pollution prevention through education,
analysis, and advocacy.
-
- Environmental Protection Agency's Global
Warming Site: This site describes the scope
of the climate problem, exploring both scientific and policy dimensions
-
- International Project for Sustainable Energy Paths:
This non-profit organization analyzes the costs of reducing carbon emissions and addresses the
policy issues surrounding the design of sustainable energy strategies.
-
- Tellus Institute, Energy Group: This organization is a
non-profit consulting firm that analyzes greenhouse gas mitigation strategies and other energy
policy issues
-
- U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable
Energy Network (EREN): This part of DOE promotes the development and adoption of efficiency
and renewable energy technologies. It also works with EPA to design voluntary programs to promote
energy efficiency and reduce pollution.
-
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Climate Protection
Division: This part of EPA designs voluntary programs to promote energy efficiency and
reduce pollution.
-
Sponsors
- This analysis built upon the Clean Energy Futures report, which
was funded by the Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable
Energy, U. S. Department of Energy. The funding to complete this paper was
provided by the Office of Air and Radiation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
-
|